Okay, so, seriously, Disney has got to stop with the screwed up sequels.
"Mulan" was fabulous. She was strong, fierce, determined, and she held her own among an army of guys in imperial China.
"Mulan II?" Not so much. It was girly and lovey far beyond my level of tolerance, even for a Disney movie.
"The Lion King." My absolute favorite Disney animated classic. My dad and I have watched it together a countless number of times, and we never get sick of it. Apparently, (although I was too young to remember this), I went to see it with my dad and cousins at the drive-in *back when the still had those* when it first came out.
"The Lion King II." Not as bad as some of the other sequels, I'll admit, but still pretty pointless. They just had to make it all lovey and ruin a good thing, didn't they?
Need I go on? Actually, I think I should. Two examples are not nearly enough.
But I'm sleepy, so too bad :P
More to come later!
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Disney's Retarded Sequels
Posted by Nida at 10:56 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I agree.
Disney is trying to destroy the memories of perfectly good classics by trying to eek every dollar out of it.
HSM!!!
HSM2!!!
HSM3!!!!
ALLLLL BEAUTIFULL!!!!!!!!
:D
They used to have drive-ins here when we were little? I thought those were gone since really long time ago.
When I was in Arkansas visiting my sister in the summer, my neices took me to see Wall-e at a drive-in. Apparently, that drive-in is one of the only two left in the country.
Post a Comment